Museum as a licensee: Only granted the rights that the licensee needs. Check the long lists above and determine what is useful in the circumstances of each license. Many legal subsidies indicate that the licence is „non-transferable.“ This means that the licensee cannot transfer his license to another licensee. This issue is discussed further in Chapter 6 under the overcompensated or transfer clause. Museum as a licensee: Although you want to make sure that a licensee is using the content properly, you can, in certain circumstances, give them leeway to correct unauthorized uses. Try to be fair and reasonable while protecting your content. As a general rule, the termination clause allows each party to terminate the contract due to a substantial or substantial breach of the licence. A violation would be, for example, that access to content is no longer available or that the licensee has not been paid. The termination of the license is usually required in writing.
Each party should be able to terminate the licence for a basic offence. Museum as a licensee: the explicit indication that fair trade applies to content granted may make a licensee appear positively for licensees. Benefits: This model allows for less management, since there is a fixed payment per payment period (year). It may be easier for licensees to budget for this fixed amount. Less registration and monitoring are needed to determine, for example, the number of pages downloaded by a licensee. Some licensees, such as libraries, granted content from museums, publishers and other content owners to their benefactors and researchers for sub-licensing purposes. For example, a CD-ROM from the Z Museum collection can be granted to Library X, and then the X library „sub-conseds“ the content on the CD-ROM to a library owner or researcher, allowing that benefactor or researcher to view the contents of the CD-ROM and print copies of certain works. Documentation in the form of a user manual can also be useful for the efficient use of licensed content. Some content owners may provide current documents, such as a printed newsletter or email. When auditing different licensing agreements, rights or „authorized uses“ are often those granted: other factors to be considered in determining the corresponding fee are factors such as: expected use of content; All maintenance or training costs associated with accessing this content; Preferences for formats that allow access to content If additional software or hardware is required by the licensee to access the content; Costs for things like content updates and future royalties for these archived content or content. Both parties must carefully consider these factors in order to determine the corresponding charge. Consider whether the fee is the only fee related to the content granted or whether there are other financial considerations such as the time it takes to negotiate the license, the legal fees associated with the license itself, and the software or hardware you may need to purchase to access the licensed content.
Check your consent and see which uses are expressly permitted. Are there any missing uses? You need to include some of these forgotten uses/rights? What is your „normal“ use of content? What about the future use of this content, does the license provide for it, or do you have to return the content owner for further approval? Do you intend to post content on flickr, YouTube or other social networking sites, and do you need additional rights? With the rights granted to you, can you continue to play a regular role in providing content to your collaborators and researchers and possibly to the general public? Because of the simple reproduction and dissemination of electronic content, content owners are concerned about uses beyond their control and try to protect themselves as much as p